The Real Future of AI Development Isn’t a New IDE

​

The Real Future of AI Development Isn’t a New IDE. It’s a New Interface for Work

For the first time since software engineering began, every major platform vendor is trying to redefine where development happens. Google introduced Antigravity.
GitHub launched Copilot Workspace.
Cursor is exploding in popularity.
JetBrains is building AI modes.
Replit is reimagining the cloud IDE. It feels like we are racing toward the AI-native IDE
a place where developers collaborate with agents that write, refactor, test, and fix code. But underneath this race is a fundamental misunderstanding about what changes in an agent-led world. The industry is solving the wrong problem.
They are trying to replace the editor, when they should be trying to redesign the interface for work. This post unpacks why.

​

1. The IDE Race Misses a Critical Point: AI Agents Do Not Work Like Humans

Most of the new AI IDEs assume that the developer remains the unit of work and that the environment belongs to the individual. But agents behave nothing like humans:

• they operate in parallel
• react instantly to events
• complete tasks in seconds
• require no meetings
• maintain internal state
• do not need manual backlogs
• do not navigate UIs
• do not rely on natural communication rituals

Humans operate on coarse cycles.
Agents operate on event loops. You can’t coordinate agents with tools built for humans.
And yet most AI IDEs attempt exactly that: they bolt agents onto a workspace designed around keystrokes, tabs, and file editing. It’s a mismatch of execution models. This mismatch becomes even sharper in the context of the current AI transformation, where agents introduce entirely new patterns of speed, parallelism and decision making that traditional IDE structures cannot support.

​

2. AI IDEs Are Solving the “Local Developer” Problem, Not the “Organizational Workflow” Problem

Cursor, Antigravity, Copilot Workspace and others are extraordinary for individual developer productivity.
They help one engineer take a task and finish it faster. But modern engineering teams do not ship software through individual work alone. They move through:

• requirements
• design
• code reviews
• documentation
• testing
• compliance
• triage
• migrations
• cross-team alignment
• release management

These happen across multiple roles: PMs, architects, QA, SREs, security, and leads.
They do not live inside an IDE. So even if AI IDEs become magical, they will never own the SDLC.
They are helping humans write code faster, but code writing is not the bottleneck.
Coordination is. And coordination does not happen in editors. That’s why the real AI transformation has less to do with enhancing the IDE and far more to do with reshaping the workflow layer that connects humans, agents and the systems they rely on.

​

3. The Missing Insight: Agents Should Be Managed Like Developers, Not Like Plugins

We already have mature systems that coordinate human work:

• Jira
• GitHub Issues
• Linear
• Azure Boards

These handle:

• task assignment
• cross-team workflows
• state transitions
• approvals
• comments
• decisions
• history
• context
• handoffs

If agents are taking work, why invent a parallel workflow UI inside an IDE? Why ask developers to track long-running agent activity in a local editor sidebar
that disappears the moment the editor is closed
that no PM or architect can access
that does not persist across roles
that cannot scale to 100 or 1000 concurrent agent tasks? It’s not just inefficient.
It’s the wrong model entirely. Agents do not belong inside the IDE.
They belong inside the SDLC system of record, alongside humans. A bug ticket where an agent runs RCA.
A feature ticket where an agent generates requirements.
A design ticket where an agent drafts architecture.
A PR where an agent runs code review loops. This vision aligns with the deeper AI transformation underway, one that enhances existing systems instead of forcing organizations into entirely new interfaces. It extends the world we already know.

​

4. The New IDE Is the Ticket System

The IDE race assumes the IDE should be the place where the agent is triggered and observed. But in an organization:

• PMs don’t work in IDEs
• architects don’t work in IDEs
• reviewers don’t work in IDEs
• security doesn’t work in IDEs
• onboarding conversations don’t happen in IDEs
• decisions aren’t recorded in IDEs
• cross-team flows aren’t visible in IDEs

The IDE is a developer workspace
not a system of record
not a coordination platform
not an enterprise interface. The real “IDE for AI development” is the ticketing system. because the AI transformation in engineering is shifting the center of gravity from code editing to workflow orchestration and shared decision making. because that is the only place where work truly lives
where roles intersect
where decisions accumulate
where state matters
where context persists
and where the organization expresses intent.

​

5. The Industry Is Moving in the Wrong Direction

The current industry assumption is flawed:

“We need a new AI IDE to replace the old IDE.”

That’s not the right framing. This framing mistake is common in early phases of AI transformation, where the industry often focuses on improving tools instead of rethinking the underlying processes those tools support. The right framing is:

“We need a new interface where humans and agents coordinate the work of building software.”

That interface must be:

• persistent
• multi-user
• auditable
• event-driven
• stateful
• workflow aware
• integrated with Git
• integrated with CI
• integrated with context stores
• accessible across roles

An IDE cannot satisfy these constraints.
A ticket system already does. The challenge is not to replace Jira.
It is to connect AI agents to it in the right way.

​

6. So What Actually Is the Future of AI Development?

Not an editor. Not a chat window. Not a local agent shell. The future is a workflow backbone where::

• tickets are state containers
• agents are workers
• humans are decision makers
• Git events are triggers
• CI is the validation surface
• PRs are delivery units
• context is centralized
• parallelism is unbounded
• everything is transparent
• nothing lives on individual machines

This is a new model of software development and it is bigger than the IDE race.

​

7. A Practical Example: Ticket-Led Agent Workflows

Imagine the future exactly as teams work today, but automated.

1. PM opens a ticket
   Agents immediately triage, classify, label, dedupe, and fetch relevant context.

2. If it’s a bug
   RCA agent investigates, posts findings, suggests hotspots, and attaches traces.
3. If it’s a feature
   Requirements agent drafts user stories, APIs, interactions, and missing questions.

4. Human reviews
   Approves, amends, corrects. No IDE required.

5. Agent produces design
   Architectural plan, diagrams, risks, patterns.

6. Human approves
   Moves ticket to “Ready for Implementation”.

7. Agent generates PR
   Self-contained, fully validated.

8. Code review agent runs
   Executes test generation, static analysis, security checks.

9. Human reviews
   Adds comments and feedback.
10. Agent fixes the code
    Applies updates across files based on reviewer notes.

11. Code review agent runs again
    Validates fixes, updates tests, checks consistency.
12. Human approves and merges
    Standard merge flow, nothing new to learn.
13. All history lives inside the ticket and PR
    Fully traceable, searchable, and shareable.

This is not theoretical. This is implementable today.
And it scales to hundreds or thousands of workflows without breaking organizational structure.

​

8. Why Overcut Fits Into This Vision

Overcut was built on a simple premise:

If agents are going to take work, they must be managed the same way teams manage humans today
using the same systems of record
with the same flows
and the same need for accountability and collaboration.

Overcut does not try to replace IDEs.
It integrates with them. Overcut’s contribution is providing the agent orchestration layer
the part the industry is currently missing
the part AI IDEs cannot solve
because they are built for the individual, not the organization. The vision is bigger than any product
but Overcut is the first platform implementing it operationally.

​

9. Closing Thought: We Don’t Need a New IDE. We Need a New Mental Model.

The future of AI-led engineering will not be won by whoever builds the smartest autocomplete or the nicest AI chat sidebar. It will be won by whoever defines the interface where humans and agents coordinate work. That interface already exists
and it’s not an editor.
It’s the ticket. The opportunity ahead is not reinventing development
but re-wiring the SDLC so humans and agents collaborate naturally, visibly, and reliably. That is the real shift.
That is the real race.
And that is the future of engineering in the agent era.